Direct and Indirect Characterization
The difference between direct and indirect characterization is the same as the difference between telling and showing. One is simply the the author telling the reader
what the character is like. The other is where the author shows what the character's like.
So an example of the former might be:
Peter was very lazy, and would never shift himself more than was absolutely necessary.
The same information, given indirectly, might be:
Peter was bored with the TV programme, but the remote control was inexplicably across the room, so he just
watched it anyway. Jan'd be in soon, and she could fetch the remote control for him then.
Just as with Show, don't tell try to use indirect characterization as
much as you can as that draws a vivid picture in the reader's mind (which is what you are always, always aiming
for). There are times, however, to use direct characterization (e.g. for a minor character, or to portray a minor
trait), and it's part of your judgement as a writer as to when you're going to use that.
|

|
If you're serious about getting your characters right, then you absolutely need Holly Lisle's
Create A Character
Clinic. Nearly 200 pages of specific, easy-to-follow tools and techniques on coming up with
fully rounded and intriguing characters - all for only $9.95. I also absolutely recommend her
Create A Plot
Clinic, also only $9.95.
Or buy them both, along with Create A Language Clinic and Create A Culture Clinic, as
Holly Lisle's
Writing Clincs Bundle for a discounted $34.95.
|
Return from Direct and Indirect
Characterization to
Character Creation
Return from Direct and Indirect Characterization to
Home
|